data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/596a5/596a59eef75dea199a16d8b6b5bd3861d7aea32f" alt="Banner Image"
U.S. Plan Eases Rules for Mortgage Lenders (New York Times)
New York Times
(8/28/2013 9:10 PM, Reuters)
Washington — Six federal regulatory agencies released a reworked proposal on Wednesday that would require lenders to maintain a stake in the loans they bundle and sell as securities, part of efforts to limit the type of underwriting practices that fed the housing bubble.
But the proposal also expanded the range of mortgages that would be exempt from the requirement.
The new rules, the latest version of a 2011 proposal, were required under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. Mortgages to borrowers who do not have to spend big chunks of their monthly income repaying the debt will be exempt from the requirement.
The regulators’ plan would exempt more loans than earlier proposals by eliminating a requirement that so-called qualified residential mortgages include a large down payment.
Housing industry and consumer groups have lobbied for more than two years against that requirement, which they said would harm the housing market recovery.
“Our goal as regulators is to provide clear rules that allow for robust markets that meet the needs of creditworthy borrowers in a safe and sound manner,” said Paul M. Nash, a senior official at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “I believe the rule, as reproposed today, helps accomplish just that.”
The new rules are aimed at preventing banks from writing risky loans with impunity.
In the years leading up to the financial crisis, banks used shoddy underwriting standards under the assumption that they could sell loans to investors and avoid harm if the borrowers defaulted.
The Dodd-Frank law called for lenders and bond issuers to hold 5 percent of those loans on their books, giving them more incentive to make better loans.
Regulators originally said that banks and bond issuers would have to hold part of the securitized loans on their books for all loans except mortgages that included a 20 percent down payment.
After criticism from housing and consumer groups, regulators decided to drop the down payment requirement.
Instead, they said on Wednesday that mortgages that met a minimum standard already adopted by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would be exempt.
The agencies will seek public comment for 60 days before holding a final vote on the new rule.
PD&R Leadership Message Archive
International & Philanthropic Spotlight Archive
Spotlight on PD&R Data Archive
Publications
Collecting, Analyzing, and Publicizing Data on Housing Turnover
Resilience Planning: What Communities Can Do to Keep Hazards from Turning into Disasters
Cityscape: Volume 26, Number 3
Case Studies
Case Study: Former School in Charleston, South Carolina, Transformed into Affordable Housing for Seniors
Case Study: Avalon Villas Combines Affordable Housing and Services for Families in a Gentrifying Phoenix Neighborhood
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1b97/b1b97f134cdaa04eb5a7cca397cdc80ec0166b79" alt="Subscribe to PD&R Edge"
The contents of this article are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government.
Note: Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.