
Trading Parking Lots for Affordable Housing [NYC] (New York Times)
New York Times
(9/14/2014, Michael Kimmelman)
What is the solution to affordable housing in New York? One number has been repeated over and over — 200,000 subsidized units, to be built or preserved over a decade. Mayor Bill de Blasio promised it, but has yet to explain how he’ll get there.
Here are two other numbers: 9 x 18. In square feet, that’s 162, smaller than the most micro micro-apartment.
It is the size of a typical parking space. That lowly slice of asphalt has prompted three young architects — Miriam Peterson, Sagi Golan and Nathan Rich, fellows at the Institute for Public Architecture — to come up with what could be an innovative way to ease the housing crisis.
I’m intrigued by their proposal, “9 x 18,” because it’s about more than apartment buildings plopped onto vacant land. It considers how parking spaces — mandated in outmoded zoning regulations, prolific at public housing sites — might be leveraged into something more ambitious, something that encourages a mix of housing in active neighborhoods with accessible transit, public services and lively streets. In effect, the proposal trades asphalt for housing and amenities.
PD&R Leadership Message Archive
International & Philanthropic Spotlight Archive
Spotlight on PD&R Data Archive
Publications
Collecting, Analyzing, and Publicizing Data on Housing Turnover
Resilience Planning: What Communities Can Do to Keep Hazards from Turning into Disasters
Cityscape: Volume 26, Number 3
Case Studies
Case Study: Former School in Charleston, South Carolina, Transformed into Affordable Housing for Seniors
Case Study: Avalon Villas Combines Affordable Housing and Services for Families in a Gentrifying Phoenix Neighborhood

The contents of this article are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government.
Note: Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.