CGP uses a needs-based formula to distribute modernization funding to eligible public and Indian housing authorities, instead of forcing them to compete annually for grants under the Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program (CIAP). The 18 housing authorities studied for this report preferred CGP to CIAP, noting such key advantages as a predictable funding stream, flexibility in setting spending priorities, and fewer requirements for HUD review and approval. The formula funding levels were considered to be fair. Transition from CIAP has been smooth, with few delays reported.
Because of more predictable funding and the ability to shift work items across years, CGP was better able to foster comprehensive, long-term planning for public housing modernization needs. CGP-required needs assessments were found to be useful. Public housing residents often were successfully involved in the planning process, although local government participation remained limited. Local spending priorities varied under CGP, but physical improvements accounted for the majority of planned expenditures.
The independent evaluation performed by Abt Associates Inc. and TAG Associates relied on indepth case studies of 15 public housing authorities and 3 Indian housing authorities. It affirms that the shift to the Comprehensive Grant Program has enhanced local control and resident participation in public housing modernization. Assessment of the Comprehensive Grant Program, Volume I: Final Report, and Volume II: Case Studies, are available from HUD USER for $5 per volume.
Next Article | Previous Article | Contact HUD USER | Table of Contents