Residential Mobility

The Residential Mobility indicator is the percentage of the population living in the same house as the previous year. Higher proportions are better because of the positive effect on neighborhood health.

A low percentage of residents remaining in the same home from year to year is a proxy for multiple, disruptive moves. Disruptive or multiple moves can affect health due to the stress related to moving. Stress can be from reactive moves and/or weakened social supports. These factors affect individual mental and physical health. Frequent household moves are linked to childhood abuse, neglect, household dysfunction, and increased likelihood of smoking and childhood suicide. Children in families that move often may have to repeat grades, and are be more likely to be suspended from school or have emotional and behavioral problems. Childhood residential instability increases lifetime risk of depression. Frequent housing turnover may also reflect negative housing conditions, or contribute to them. Although high residential instability is usually a sign of distress, some neighborhoods have high residential mobility because of less concerning reasons. For example, many college students move between school years in the University of Minnesota neighborhood. Residential Mobility is in the Social Cohesion domain.

Neighborhood Indicator Value Ranksort descending
Keewaydin 94.3% 1
Ericsson 91.3% 2
Fulton 91.1% 3
Page 91.1% 3
Field 90.5% 5
Kenny 90.2% 6
Regina 89.8% 7
Waite Park 89.7% 8
Diamond Lake 89.2% 9
Bancroft 88.8% 10
Lynnhurst 88.2% 11
Northrop 88.2% 11
Hale 87.9% 13
Armatage 87.7% 14
Victory 87.4% 15
Wenonah 86.6% 16
Logan Park 86.3% 17
Morris Park 86.0% 18
Bryn - Mawr 85.8% 19
Howe 85.6% 20
Standish 85.0% 21
Sumner - Glenwood (Heritage Park) 84.7% 22
Audubon Park 84.7% 22
Longfellow 84.4% 24
Lind - Bohanon 83.9% 25
Windom 83.9% 25
Kenwood 83.8% 27
Minnehaha 83.4% 28
Columbia Park 83.2% 29
Marshall Terrace 83.2% 29
Humboldt Industrial Area 83.0% 31
Shingle Creek 83.0% 31
Hiawatha 82.6% 33
Linden Hills 82.4% 34
Tangletown 82.1% 35
Cooper 81.9% 36
Windom Park 81.7% 37
King Field 81.4% 38
Central 80.4% 39
Bryant 80.1% 40
East Harriet 79.4% 41
Sheridan 79.2% 42
Harrison 79.1% 43
Powderhorn Park 79.1% 43
Nicollet Island - East Bank 79.0% 45
Lyndale 78.7% 46
St. Anthony West 78.6% 47
Lowry Hill 78.3% 48
Corcoran 77.7% 49
Webber - Camden 77.6% 50
Camden Industrial 77.0% 51
Bottineau 76.1% 52
Holland 76.1% 52
Willard - Hay 76.1% 52
Hawthorne 75.6% 55
Seward 75.6% 55
East Phillips 74.9% 57
Near - North 74.6% 58
Cedar - Isles - Dean 73.8% 59
Cleveland 73.7% 60
St. Anthony East 72.2% 61
Midtown Phillips 72.1% 62
Jordan 71.8% 63
Phillips West 71.5% 64
Calhoun Area Residents Action Group (CARAG) 70.8% 65
West Calhoun 70.4% 66
Folwell 70.2% 67
East Isles 69.7% 68
Ventura Village 69.3% 69
McKinley 69.2% 70
East Calhoun (ECCO) 68.9% 71
Loring Park 68.8% 72
Beltrami 68.0% 73
Northeast Park 68.0% 73
Lowry Hill East 65.5% 75
Whittier 64.8% 76
North Loop 63.1% 77
Steven's Square - Loring Heights 61.8% 78
Elliot Park 60.9% 79
Downtown East 59.5% 80
Como 59.1% 81
Mid - City Industrial 59.1% 81
Downtown West 57.9% 83
Cedar Riverside 48.9% 84
Marcy Holmes 43.5% 85
Prospect Park - East River Road 41.7% 86
University of Minnesota 41.7% 86

Key Citations:
1. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1979;109(2):186-204.

2. Bures RM. 2003. Childhood residential stability and health at midlife. American Journal of Public Health 93:1144-8.

3. Cooper, Merrill. 2001. Housing Affordability: A Children's Issue. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks Discussion Paper.

4. Dong M. 2005. Childhood residential mobility and multiple health risks during adolescence and adulthood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 159:11-4-1110.

5. Gilman SE, Kawachi I, Fizmaurice GM Buka L. 2003. Socio-economic status, family disruption and residential stability in childhood: relation to onset, recurrence and remission of major depression. Psychol Medicine 33:1341-55.